The sumptuously printed Broadside Library of Thornwillow Makers now includes the mission statement of the National Men’s League for Woman Suffrage as presented in 1912 by James Lees Laidlaw, the president of this organization of thousands of prominent men across thirty-five states. The league is the subject of my new book, The Suffragents: How Women Used Men to Get the Vote. Laidlaw was a financier, scion of Laidlaw & Company, and a member of the board of directors of what became Standard & Poor’s. He was, not coincidentally, the husband of the great New York suffragist, Harriet Burton Laidlaw, and one of many men of position and influence who turned the moniker “suffrage husband” into a title of distinction, in the words of Ida Husted Harper. Full disclosure: I made the broadside happen, via my husband’s good offices and on from there to our talented friend, Luke Pontifell, Thornwillow’s leader and guiding creative force. I happened on the statement in a suffrage scrapbook, attributed to the St. John Daily Evening Globe of New Brunswick, Canada, dated May 17, 1912. It was included as part of a column, which you can read below, signed by the playwright, George Middleton, another great Men’s Leaguer, whose wife and muse was the actress and suffragist Fola La Follette. I haven’t seen the mission statement anywhere else. Here is Middleton’s column and Laidlaw’s text once again:
There are many men who inwardly feel the justice of equal suffrage, but who are not ready to acknowledge it publicly, unless backed by numbers. There are other men who are not even ready to give the subject consideration until they see that a large number of men are willing to be counted in favor of it. The man who is so prejudice that he will not consider it at all will pass away with this generation if not sooner.
The usefulness of the Men’s Leagues politically to women constitutes one of the unanswerable arguments for woman suffrage. Legislators are mainly responsible to voters, and voters only. In the majority of States in this country, earnest determined women are besieging the Legislatures, endeavoring to bring about the submission of a woman suffrage amendment to the people. How long and burdensome is this effort on the part of non-voters, everyone knows. If a well-organized minority of men voters demand equal suffrage legislation from the Legislatures they will get it. After that, it is only a question of propaganda, and the men’s Leagues come in again on the first proposition of moral support.
The great educational work in the woman’s movement has been done by women, th[r]ough a vast expenditure of energy and against great odds. There is still work to be done and hard work. We men can make it easier and happier work if we join in it, and no longer stand aside, as too many men have done, leaving the women to toil and struggle, making up in vital energy what they lack in political power.
As statements of purpose go, I would submit that the Men’s League’s could well serve as a primer for any ally, or organized group of allies, who want to support a cause not readily considered their own. Just imagine men today of such political, social, and financial reach organizing of their own volition once again, now, a hundred years later, in concrete, active support of a perceived women’s cause. Think equal pay for equal work or family leave or against sexual trafficking and violence against women.
The photograph just above is of the bronze plaque that hangs in the State Street Side lobby of the state capital building in Albany, New York, a tribute to the eighty-three most important women of the state’s seventy-year-long suffrage campaign and one man, James Lees Laidlaw, honored among the ten suffragists listed on the plaque’s “National Honor Roll.” The others in the national grouping with him are Gertrude Foster Brown , Mary Garrett Hay, Florence Kelley, Mrs. Frank Leslie, Harriet May Mills, Anna Garlin Spencer, Katrina Ely Tiffany, and Vira Boarman Whitehouse, whose husband, James Norman de Rapelye Whitehouse, was active in the Men’s League, as were the husbands of two on the plaque’s “State Honor Roll,” Narcissa Cox Vanderlip, wife of Frank Vanderlip, and Maud Nathan Nathan, married to Frederick Nathan.
← Previous article
National History Day contestants, please read this before you contact me.
The Suffragents won the Gold Medal in US History in the 2018 Independent Publisher Book Awards and was a finalist for the 2018 Sally and Morris Lasky Prize, presented by the Center for Political History. See “Summer Camp Newsletters” and Facebook posts from book-related appearances. Reviews, notices, and articles about my books are under their titles here. My articles are here.
January 29: Exhibition Opening Remarks: “Women Get the Vote: A Historic Look at the Nineteenth Amendment,“New York Society Library. February 23: “Public Values in Conflict with Animal Agribusiness Practices,” UCLA Law School, Los Angeles. March 13:“ The Suffragents,” Scarsdale Woman’s Club, Scarsdale NY. March 24: League of Women Voters, Albany County at the Bethlehem (NY) Public Library. March 25: “Judges, Lawyers, and Women’s Suffrage: Recognizing the Men Who Stood with Women on the Front Lines,” Gender Fairness Committee of the Third Judicial District, CLE, NY State Courts at SUNY Albany Law School, Albany NY. May 15: “The Republican Suffragents,” National Women’s Republican Club, New York City. August 7: “From Emma Goldman to the Marketplace of Ideas: Marking the 100th Anniversary of Free Speech at the Supreme Court,.” AEJMC, Toronto.